Legal Opinion

Carcieri v. Salazar

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 2009No. 07-526PublishedCited by 330 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

The Indian Reorganization Act (IRA or Act) authorizes the Secretary of the Interior, a respondent in this case, to acquire land and hold it in trust “for the purpose of providing *382land for Indians.” §5, 48 Stat. 985, 25 U. S. C. §465. The IRA defines the term “Indian” to “include all persons of Indian descent who are members of any recognized Indian tribe now under Federal jurisdiction.” §479. The Secretary notified petitioners — the State of Rhode Island, its Governor, and the town of Charlestown, Rhode Island — that he intended to accept in trust a parcel of land for use by the Narragansett…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by330 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. WesbySupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Bostock v. Clayton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  3. Corley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. District of Columbia v. WesbySupreme Court of the United States · 2018

325 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API