Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Carter
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit is for damages for an assault and battery alleged to have been committed by an agent or employee of the defendant. The only eyewitnesses who testified were the plaintiff and ’said agent of defendant, who is alleged to have committed the injury for which complaint is made. Their evidence was in conflict, and susceptible to such inferences as might be drawn by the jury.
The first count of the complaint was not subject to the grounds of demurrer that were assigned. Mobile Light & R. Co. v. Portiss, 195 Ala. 320, 332, 70 So. 136; Clinton Min. Co. v. Bradford, 200 Ala. 308, 76 So. 74;…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Best Park & Amusement Co. v. RollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Leith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Busby v. Truswal Systems Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Birmingham Baptist Hospital, Inc. v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- American Ry. Express Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. EricksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.