Legal Opinion
Boca Investerings Partnership v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 22, 2000No. CIV. A. 97-0602(PLF)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion in limine to exclude defendant’s Exhibits 91 and 92, which now is fully briefed. Upon consideration of plaintiffs’ motion, the opposition, replies, surre-plies and supplemental submissions, the Court finds that Exhibits 91 and 92 are not admissible under the business records exception to the hearsay rule, the residual exception to the hearsay rule, or as statements of co-conspirators. It therefore grants plaintiffs’ motion.
Exhibit 92, entitled “CREDIT PROPOSAL” and dated April 5, 1990,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Gary Anthony PatrickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Joseph E. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Dwayne A. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- The Bank of New York Mellon v. Danielle ShoneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- Boca Investerings Partnership v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Bouygues Telecom, S.A. v. TekelecDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2007
- In Re KatzburgUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2004
- Partido Revolucionario Dominicano (PRD) Seccional Metropolitana de Washington-DC, Maryland y Virginia v. Partido Revolucionario Dominicano, Seccional de Maryland y VirginiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.