Legal Opinion

Bouygues Telecom, S.A. v. Tekelec

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided February 8, 2007No. 5:05-cr-00078PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FLANAGAN, Chief Judge.

This matter comes now before the court upon a motion in limine of plaintiff (DE #281) wherein it seeks an order finding that the deposition testimony of two former employees of defendant is not hearsay and may be admitted at trial. Defendant opposes the motion (DE #293). Having considered the arguments in support of and in opposition to the instant motion, the court DENIES the motion for the reasons stated below.

BACKGROUND

During discovery, plaintiff took the depositions of two former employees of defendant, Lori Craven and Mark Gauldin. Both Craven and Gauldin were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Weisgram v. Marley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. Portsmouth Paving Corporation and R. Curtis Saunders, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Brothers Construction Company of Ohio, Incorporated, United States of America v. Tri-State Asphalt CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  5. Kinser v. Gehl CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DiQuollo v. Prosperity Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
  2. Bryant v. Yorktowne Cabinetry, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API