Legal Opinion

Partido Revolucionario Dominicano (PRD) Seccional Metropolitana de Washington-DC, Maryland y Virginia v. Partido Revolucionario Dominicano, Seccional de Maryland y Virginia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 25, 2004No. CIV.A.01-1359(PLF)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

At the conclusion of the bench trial in this matter, the Court reserved ruling on the admissibility of two items of evidence offered by the defendants and requested supplemental briefs from the parties addressing this issue. Defendants thereafter filed a motion to admit evidence and a statement of points and authorities in support thereof, and plaintiffs filed an opposition. Upon consideration of the filings of the parties, the Federal Rules of Evidence and the relevant case law, the Court denies defendants’ motion to admit evidence.

I.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Larry D. HallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. LemireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Mike DarwichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Dwayne A. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Miriam SantosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Partido Revolucionario Dominicano (Prd) Seccional Metropolitana De Washington-Dc, Maryland Y Virginia v. Partido Revolucionario Dominicano, Seccional De Maryland Y VirginiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API