Legal Opinion
Anderson v. City of Thousand Oaks
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 1976No. Civ. 46217PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHENS, Acting P. J.
Appellants Anderson and Clouse brought this action for the wrongful death of their son when the automobile in which he was riding failed to negotiate the curve of a road designed, constructed, and maintained by respondent City of Thousand Oaks. After responsive pleadings were filed, the city moved for summary judgment on the basis of several grounds of public entity immunity. Summary judgment was granted and the action was dismissed, whereupon appellant filed this appeal.
Facts
On the evening of November 4, 1972, appellants’ son, Dennis Michael Anderson, was riding…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Baldwin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Cameron v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Teall v. City of CudahyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Daniel v. State, Dept. of Transp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Grenier v. City of IrwindaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Sumner Peck Ranch, Inc. v. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
- Harland v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.