Legal Opinion

Chapman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1982No. 44060PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Presiding Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 27.26 motion. Movant pleaded guilty to burglary second degree, a violation of § 569.170 RSMo. 1978 and was sentenced to three years with the Department of Corrections to be served consecutive to a sentence received in St. Louis County. We affirm.

In his Rule 27.26 motion, movant contends he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney led him to believe his sentence would run concurrent to the sentence received in St. Louis' County “despite what the judge [might] say” during…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  2. Wells v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Bierey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Porter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Grove v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Walker v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Small v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Sinn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API