Legal Opinion

Sinn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1987No. 53015PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Movant Timothy Sinn appeals from judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant sought relief from a four (4) year sentence imposed following a plea of guilty to second degree burglary. Section 569.170 RSMo 1986. Movant bases his claim for relief under Rule 27.26 on the contention that his plea was not voluntarily and intelligently made because he did not understand the meaning of the term “consecutive” and actually entered his guilty plea thinking his term would run concurrently to the sentence imposed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reeder v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Chapman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Lohman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fairley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Shaw v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Moore v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Davis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Hagen v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API