Walker v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*872MANFORD, Presiding Judge.
This is a direct appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief pursuant to a Rule 27.26 motion. The judgment is affirmed.
Movant presents four points, which in summary charge that the trial court erred in denying his request for post-conviction relief, because (1) the trial court failed to send notice to appellant of the specific date the court would rule whether an evidentia-ry hearing would be granted on movant’s Rule 27.26 motion, and such failure denied movant his right to a change of judge, (2) the trial court ruled that movant was not entitled to an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Wheatley v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Row v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Riley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Mills v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bundy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Rogers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Nolan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.