Legal Opinion

Walker v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 1985No. WD 36584PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*872MANFORD, Presiding Judge.

This is a direct appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief pursuant to a Rule 27.26 motion. The judgment is affirmed.

Movant presents four points, which in summary charge that the trial court erred in denying his request for post-conviction relief, because (1) the trial court failed to send notice to appellant of the specific date the court would rule whether an evidentia-ry hearing would be granted on movant’s Rule 27.26 motion, and such failure denied movant his right to a change of judge, (2) the trial court ruled that movant was not entitled to an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. Wheatley v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  3. Row v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. Riley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  2. Mills v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Bundy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Rogers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Nolan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API