People v. Vo Nghia Sy
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McConnell, P. J.
INTRODUCTION
Separate juries convicted Jacqueline Duenas Sy and Vo Nghia Sy 1 of selling or possessing counterfeit marks and found true allegations they sold or possessed 1,000 or more articles, or articles valued at more than $400, displaying or containing a counterfeit mark (Pen. Code, 2 § 350, subd. (a)(2)). 3 The court placed Jacqueline and Vo on summary probation for three years. The court granted Vo's motion to reduce his conviction to a misdemeanor (~ 17, subd. (b)). However, the court (a different judge) denied Jacqueline's motion to reduce her conviction to a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. SelivanovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. TranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. S.O. (In re S.O.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In re Kevin A. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.