Legal Opinion

People v. S.O. (In re S.O.)

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 28, 2018No. B281863PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoffstadt, J.

*1096Under Welfare and Institutions Code section 730.6, a juvenile court has the power to require a minor to pay restitution in the amount "sufficient to fully reimburse the victim ... for all determined economic losses incurred as the result of " the criminal conduct that makes him subject to the juvenile court's jurisdiction. ( Welf. & Inst. Code, § 730.6, subd. (h)(1), italics added.)1 Does a juvenile court have the authority to require restitution for losses beyond those that resulted from the criminal conduct with which the minor is charged? We conclude that the answer is "yes" if that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re J.G.California Court of Appeal · 2026
  2. In re M.J. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. In re S.E.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. Lopezvelasquez CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. Trout-LacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API