Esco Operating Corp. v. Kaplan
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinbrink, J.
The plaintiffs’ affiliated corporations own and operate sixteen moving picture theatres in the city of New York. All of these theatres had entered into contracts in October, 1931, with the Empire State Motion Picture Operators Union, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Empire Union), which do not expire until January, 1937, and under the terms of which plaintiffs were obligated to employ as moving picture operators only members of the Empire Union. This union absorbed or assimilated an earlier organization known as the Brotherhood of Motion Picture Projectionists. • During the summer of 1931…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nann v. RaimistNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Stillwell Theatre, Inc. v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Schlesinger v. QuintoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Albro J. Newton Co. v. EricksonNew York Supreme Court · 1911
- Underhill v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bankers' Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. SlossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Gossett v. Atlantic Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Art Steel Co. v. VelazquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952