Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Art Steel Co. v. Velazquez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 25, 1952Published
1ConcurrenceVan Voorhis, J.
The Taft-Hartley Act (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 141 et seq.) is invoked by District 50, United Mine Workers of America (U.M.W.A.), and employees of plaintiff whom it is attempting to organize, in applying for a reversal of a temporary injunction order obtained by plaintiff and Local 1764, United Steel Workers of America, C.I.O., restraining interference with a labor contract between plaintiff and said C.I'.O. Local. No labor dispute under section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act is involved.
We concur in those portions of the opinion by Mr. Justice Callahan relative to acts of violence as forming…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Union, U. A. W. A., A. F. of L., Local 232 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v. Textile Workers UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Goodwins, Inc. v. HagedornNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Fay v. American Cystoscope Makers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Standard Oil Co. of Ky. v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.