Legal Opinion
Bankers' Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Sloss
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 7, 1934No. 6 Div. 511PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The action of the trial court in sustaining demurrers to the bill and in dismissing the same on failure to amend, is assigned as error.
The bill was by the Bankers’ Fire & Marine Insurance Company, a corporation, to restrain respondents from conspiring and in concert unlawfully interfering with the business of the complainant, and from interfering and disturbing the harmonious relations existing between the complainant and its stockholders.
That pleading’and its exhibit, with the usual» le'ave of reference, will be taken in its entirety, and the exhibit will illustrate, explain,…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Short v. Hotel Riviera, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1963
- Barber v. StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Carter v. Knapp Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Kelite Products, Inc., and R. C. Martin v. Alvin J. Binzel, Jr., Trading as Kelite Products of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.