Legal Opinion

Sevast v. Kakouras

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 26, 2003PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY BOWES, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Gertrude Sevast, appeals from the order dismissing her motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees, Gail Sunday, James Sunday, and Glen Gubich (“Garnishees”). We reverse.

¶2 The trial court succinctly summarized a portion of the procedural history as follows:

In 1992 [Appellant] obtained a judgment against ... James Kakouras ... in Lancaster County pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act. Later, that judgment was modified to $161,628.24, based upon further Workers’ Compensation…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pappas v. AsbelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Hotel Casey Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Lewis v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Brown v. CandeloraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. J. Purdy Cope Hotels Co. v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sevast v. KakourasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Salvadia v. AshbrookSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Szymanski v. Wachovia Bank, N.A. (In Re Szymanski)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. In Re R.H.R. Mechanical Contractors, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Alstom Power, Inc. v. RMF Industrial Contracting, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API