Legal Opinion

State v. Kurtz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 16, 1980No. C 78-08-12943, CA 14006PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, J.

In a prosecution for possession of the controlled substance cocaine, the state appeals from an order suppressing evidence obtained in a patdown and search of defendant. On cross-appeal, defendant assigns as error the denial of his motions to suppress evidence resulting from a search of his daypack and to suppress statements made after an allegedly unlawful detention. Defendant also assigns as error the overruling of his demurrer to the indictment for failure to state facts constituting an offense. We affirm in all respects.

In August, 1978, several police officers executed a warrant to search…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. AndrewsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  4. State v. WillsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  5. State v. MiearsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API