Legal Opinion

State v. Wills

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 6, 1994No. C2-94-1354PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

In a pretrial motion, respondent Lorrell Devaugn Wills moved to suppress evidence because, he claimed, the safe searched and seized was outside the scope of the premises search warrant. The district court found that the safe was outside the scope of the search warrant, suppressed the evidence, and dismissed the charges. We reverse.

FACTS

The facts in this case are undisputed. In March 1994, the police obtained a search warrant for an apartment located in Burns-ville. The apartment was rented by Torc-helle Holmes, Wills’ girlfriend. Although Wills told police that he…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. AndrewsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Houghton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. DriscollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. SalyersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. State v. CouillardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API