Madgett v. Monroe County Mutual Tornado Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
The plaintiff seeks to recover as the insured from the defendant as insurer under an insurance policy covering windstorm damages. The weakness in plaintiff’s case is that he had no policy of insurance with the defendant company on the date when the damages were sustained. The company had issued a windstorm policy to the previous owner but that policy had not been assigned to plaintiff, and no new policy had been issued. The relationship of insurer and insured derives from a contract of insurance. Here it is conceded that there was no contract of insurance between the plaintiff and the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Welch v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Ahnapee & Western Railway Co. v. ChallonerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Artmar, Inc. v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Schuster v. Germantown Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Shearer v. Dunn County Farmers Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Shannon v. ShannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- Shannon v. Great American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Gustavson v. O'BRIENWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Maxwell v. Hartford Union High School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Hoeft v. United States Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.