Legal Opinion

Hoeft v. United States Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 11, 1989No. 89-0571PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

Hubert J. Hoeft appeals from a grant of summary judgment to United States Fire Insurance Company (U.S. Fire). Hoeft mainly alleges that a factual dispute exists as to whether the policy issued by U.S. Fire was improperly nonrenewed under sec. 631.36(4), Stats. (1983-84), 1 and therefore as to whether his injury was covered under that policy. Hoeft also contends that U.S. Fire is estopped from denying coverage. Because we reverse based on his first claim, we need not discuss the estoppel issue.

Hoeft was injured on December 3,1984, while using a sling and hook mechanism manufactured by United…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Noll v. Dimiceli's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  3. Lambert v. WrenschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Ford Farms, Ltd. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  5. Iowa National Mutual Insurance v. BackensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pilar Domer v. Menard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  2. Piaskoski & Associates v. RicciardiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  3. Maxwell v. Hartford Union High School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Eden Stone Co. v. Oakfield Stone Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  5. Utica Mutual Insurance v. Klein & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API