Artmar, Inc. v. United Fire & Casualty Co.

Two issues are raised on this appeal:(1) Can the doctrine of estoppel be used to bring a location not included in an insurance contract within the coverage of the policy risk?(2) Was there a sufficient issue of fact as to the existence of a different agreement than the one contained in the insurance contract so that the motion for summary judgment on the reformation cause of action should be denied ?

Estoppel.

The issue in this case is whether the outbuildings on the “Kunnert property” come within the coverage of the United Fire & Casualty Company policy. The policy clause expressly covers only…