Legal Opinion

Schuster v. Germantown Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1968No. 22PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The insurance policy described Tunnel City as the location of the property and the insuring clause insured against “all direct loss by fire ... to the property described herein while located or contained as described in this policy, . . . but not elsewhere.” Recently this court reviewed the rules applicable to the reformation of insurance policies. To ground such an action there must be proof of a prior oral agreement, which through mistake, fraud or negligence the written policy does not express. Shearer v. Dunn County Farmers Mut. Ins. Co. (1968), 39 Wis. 2d 240, 159 N. W. 2d 89; Artmar,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bloomer v. BloomerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ahnapee & Western Railway Co. v. ChallonerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Rosenthal v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Artmar, Inc. v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Shearer v. Dunn County Farmers Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Shannon v. ShannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hardscrabble Ski Area, Inc. v. First National Bank of Rice LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Zimmer v. DaunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Vandenberg v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Stueck v. Le DucWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API