Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Albuquerque v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1941No. 4573Published

1DissentSadler, Justice

The majority opinion gives priority to the paving lien over the conservancy lien, resting its conclusion both upon the pertinent paving statute, L.1923, c. 133, and upon an application of the common law principle that first in time is first in right. In so far as the priority accorded rests upon the statute, it involves an unwarranted definition of the word “incumbrancer”. And a proper application of common law principles is denied by an obvious implication of equality arising from the controlling language of the two statutes involved — L.1923, c.133, § 1 and L.1923, c. 140, § 515(1) (c).

The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sturdivant Bank v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. Crabb v. . YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. State Ex Rel. Drainage District No. 8 v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Hollenbeck v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Brownell Improvement Co. v. NixonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API