Legal Opinion
Farmer v. Baldwin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 15, 2007No. 06-35635PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
ORDER
George Edward Farmer (“Farmer”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, arising from his conviction in Oregon state court on one count of murder. The district court did not reach the merits of Farmer’s claims, ruling instead that he failed to exhaust available state remedies, and that his claims are now procedurally defaulted.
Farmer contends on appeal that the district court erred in so concluding, arguing that because he complied with Oregon pror cedural rules to present his claims to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Farmer v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Farmer v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Blackgold v. MaddenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Farmer v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009