Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Schlossman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 5, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schulz, S.

As the result of an application to compel an accounting, this account and a petition for its judicial settlement were filed.

The persons interested in this estate are the decedent’s wife and eight children. Of these, Pauline Kahn, a daughter, and Abraham Schlossman, a son, filed answers containing objections. Upon the hearing, some of these objections were stricken out on motion, and others were withdrawn. Subsequently it was stipulated that the objections filed by the contestants should be considered as being the objections of another son, Louis Schlossman, and that the objections…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. In Re the Accounting of BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. In Re the Estate of HousmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Griswold v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Tillie Von Au v. MagenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of RandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In re the Estate of SharpNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  3. In re the Estate of MufflingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API