Foley v. Storrie
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the County Court of McLennan.
1Opinion of the Court
COLLARD, Associate Justice.
It was error to instruct the jury that there was no consideration for the contract sued on, and the assignment must be sustained.
On the 1st day of February, 1890, plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract, by which plaintiff was to deliver to defendant 1000 cords of cedar wood on railway cars near Fowler, in Bosque County, to commence work at once, load first car in fifteen days from date, and load one car each day thereafter for the first five days, to increase the loads to thirty cords per day by March 1, and to continue delivering thirty cords per day;…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bishop v. BusseIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Goebel v. LinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- City of Galveston v. Galveston City R. R. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by15 opinions
- Boatner v. Providence-Washington Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Hicks v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Hinton v. D'YarmettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Evans v. Oregon & Washington RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Worth Petroleum Co. v. CallihanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.