Legal Opinion

Worth Petroleum Co. v. Callihan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1935No. 1438PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FUNDERBURK, Justice.

George Callihan sued Worth Petroleum Company to recover $194.45 and interest, same being the alleged balance due upon a note for $3,592.57, dated April 15, 1933, due on or before two years aftef date, but which note, as to the time payable, also recited: “This note is payable in monthly payments according to contract and assign- . ment from Worth Petroleum Company to George Callihan.” The amount sued for was recovered both in the justice court and, upon appeal, in the county court. The pleadings were oral, but are set out in the statement of facts. About May 3, 1933, the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HarriettTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Otto v. Halff & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Ferguson-McKinney Dry Goods Co. v. GarrettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Bandman v. . FinnNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Ferguson v. MansfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Putoma Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  2. Burlington-Rock Island Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. DoAll Dallas Co. v. Trinity National Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Howard P. Kells and Caltex Joint Venture v. John J. Maloney and Marianne Maloney, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1992
  5. Juan Alberto Rey and Roberto Alvarez-Rey v. Carlos Lara and Benito Lara, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API