Legal Opinion
Hinton v. D'Yarmett
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 29, 1919No. 9152PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Montague County; C. R. Pearman, Judge. Action by Harley R. Hinton against E. C. D’Yarmett and others. General demurrer to plaintiff’s amended petition sustained, and the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
The only question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in sustaining a general demurrer to appellant's amended petition, which, omitting formal parts, appellees thus set forth, viz.:
"That plaintiff resides in the county of Montague and the state of Texas. That defendant E. C. D'Yarmett resides in the county of Muskogee, Okla. That the defendant O. M. Topley resides in the county of Oklahoma and the state of Oklahoma, and that defendant Assurance Oil Refining Company is a corporation duly incorporated under the laws of the state of Oklahoma, its principal office in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sumner v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. SmithdealTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Birchfield v. BourlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Atlantic & Pacific Rld. v. ReisnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Sullivan v. DooleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Protestant Episcopal Church Council of the Diocese of Texas v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Hawks v. YanceyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Wichita Falls Electric Co. v. HueyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Hoyt v. GeistCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Carr v. FroelichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.