Legal Opinion

Federal Power Commission v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 3, 1962No. 48PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

This case involves the authority of the Federal Power Commission after hearing to order an interim rate reduction as well as a refund of amounts collected in excess thereof where a portion of a previously filed increased rate is found unjustified but the remainder of the proceeding is deferred. Respondent Tennessee Gas Transmission Company, a natural gas company, included within its filed increased rate schedule a 7% over-all return on its net investment. In considering this item 1 along with others involved in the filing, including the allocation of the over-all cost of service among its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Mississippi Power & Light Co. & Mississippi Public Service Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Federal Power Commission v. Sunray DX Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API