Legal Opinion
People v. Snowberger
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 1897PublishedCited by 41 opinions
Exceptions before judgment from Monroe; Kinne, J. Michael Snowberger was convicted of selling adulterated food, in violation of Net No. 193, Public Acts of 1895.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.
Respondent was convicted under an information charging that—
“On the 19th day of April, A. D. 1897, at the city of Monroe, and in the county aforesaid, Michael Snowberger did offer for sale, and sell, to Carl Franke, an adulterated article of food, to wit, a quantity of mustard, to wit, a quarter of a pound, colored and adulterated with tumeric, *87whereby the said mustard, as an article of food, was damaged, and its inferiority concealed, and whereby it was made to appear of better and of greater value than it really was, the same not being a mixture or compound recognized as ordinary articles…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- State v. HartfielWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- Commonwealth v. RaymondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- People v. . CipperlyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Commonwealth v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Carolene Products Co. v. ThomsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Grocers Dairy Co. v. Department of Agriculture DirectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. QuinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1920
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.