People v. North
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Ingham; Wisner, J., presiding. George North was convicted of violating the liquor law.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The defendant was convicted of being engaged in the business of unlawfully selling malt, brewed, vinous, and fermented liquors, at retail, without having paid the tax required by law. The testimony was undisputed. At its conclusion the learned circuit judge said to the jury:
*613“ In a case wnere the facts are undisputed and sufficient of them are undisputed to make a case in favor of the people, then it is the duty of the court to tell the jury so, and to ask them to find a verdict in accordance with that fact. * * * Now, as I understand the law, gentlemen, the sale of that mixture is a violation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. NeumannMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. GardnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. CollisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. HeikkalaMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Judd v. JuddMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. DoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.