Sentell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.
The information in this case charged that in Beckham county, on the 20th day of November, 1935, Ike Sentell and Zetta Sentell did unlawfully have the possession of a still fit for the manufacture of intoxicating liquors.
Upon her separate trial the jury returned a verdict finding the defendant Zetta Sentell guilty of “the possession of a still as charged in the information” and fixing her punishment at a fine of $150 and 90 days’ imprisonment in the county jail. She has appealed from the judgment rendered on the verdict.
It appears that the defendant was poor and on account of her poverty was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- King v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Crowdis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
- State v. RenslowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Neff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
- Peter Joseph O'Donnell Et Ux. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Paris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.