Legal Opinion

King v. City of Owensboro

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 10, 1920PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

*22Edith. King, a married woman, was fined $30.00 by the police court of Owensboro for 'selling intoxicating liquor without a license. On appeal to the Daviess circuit court she was again found guilty and her punishment fixed at a fine of $100.00 and costs. She appeals.

It is first insisted that the court erred in permitting the city to prove the license ordinance by filing a certified copy of only parts thereof. The copy introduced in evidence was certified by the city clerk as a true and correct copy. The record before us shows…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CleavesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1871
  2. Nagle v. TiepermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Turner v. HeavrinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Lane v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  5. Mulvey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1869

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. MurraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  2. Sentell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. State v. RenslowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Haning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  5. Harris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API