Legal Opinion

ASUNCION

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1966No. 1600PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #1600 MATTER OF Af31TROION • In Visa, Petition Proceedings A-13511195 Decided by Regional Commissioner May 17, 1986 A medical technologist is not a member of the professions within the contem- plation of section 208(a) (8) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended by P.L. 89-236, and, therefore, is ineligible for third preference classification. Discussion: The District Director, Cleveland, Ohio denied the • petition and certified the case to this office for review. The petition seeks third preference classification of the beneficiary • as a, member of the…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. KATIGBAKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1971
  2. Hong Kong T v. Video Program, Inc. v. IlchertDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1988
  3. Young China Daily v. ChappellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1989
  4. PANGANIBANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1970
  5. LINGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API