Legal Opinion

KATIGBAK

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1971No. 2125PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2125 MATTER OF KATIGBAK In Visa Petition Proceedings A-17918612 Decided by Regional Commissioner October 18, 1971 To be eligible for preference classification under section 203(aX3) of the Immigra- tion and Nationality Act, as amended, the beneficiary must be a qualified member of the professions at the time of the filing of the visa petition. Education or experience acquired subsequent to the filing date of such visa petition may not be considered in support thereof since to do so would result in according the beneficiary a priority date for visa issuance at a time when not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. BRANTIGANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
  2. ASUNCIONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
  3. SHINBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
  4. PANGANIBANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1970

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. IZUMMIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1998
  2. Tingzi Wang v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. GREAT WALLBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1977
  4. Stewart Infra-Red Commissary of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Patrick F. Coomey, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  5. BARDOUILLEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API