Legal Opinion

Young China Daily v. Chappell

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 20, 1989No. C-88-4081-DLJPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JENSEN, District Judge.

By their complaint in this action, plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that the INS denial of a visa petition filed by plaintiff Young China Daily on behalf of plaintiff Henry Kuo was arbitrary, contrary to law, and an abuse of discretion. Plaintiffs additionally seek an order compelling defendants to confer nonimmigrant temporary worker (“H-l”) status upon Henry Kuo pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(H)(i).

The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment came on for hearing on March 29, 1989. Having considered the pleadings, the parties’ memoranda, and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Song Jook Suh v. George K. Rosenberg, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  2. ASUNCIONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
  3. SHINBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
  4. ESSEX CRYOGENICS INDUSTRIESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1972
  5. GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANYBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shanti, Inc. v. RenoDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  2. EG Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
  3. Residential Finance Corp. v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  4. Button Depot, Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
  5. Ching Yee Wong v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API