Legal Opinion

Hong Kong T v. Video Program, Inc. v. Ilchert

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 4, 1988No. C-87-2062-WWSPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

SCHWARZER, District Judge.

On September 19, 1985, plaintiff Hong Kong T.V. Video Program, Inc., submitted a visa petition to the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) to classify See Soo Chuan (“beneficiary”) as a temporary worker of “distinguished merit and ability” pursuant to section 101(a)(15)(H)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“Act”), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15XH)(i). The visa would enable the beneficiary to work as the plaintiff’s president and chief executive officer.

The INS denied the petition on the grounds that a president and chief execu…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Hintopoulos v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States Ex Rel. Kaloudis v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. Song Jook Suh v. George K. Rosenberg, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. ASUNCIONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
  5. Oi Lan Lee v. District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service at Los Angeles, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shanti, Inc. v. RenoDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  2. CARON INTERNATIONALBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  3. Omni Packaging, Inc. v. United States Immigration & Naturalization ServicesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1990
  4. Young China Daily v. ChappellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1989
  5. Augat, Inc. v. TaborDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API