Legal Opinion
Timken-Detroit Axle Co. v. Alma Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 14, 1947No. 8300PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff (herein referred to as Tim-ken) brought a declaratory judgment suit against defendant (herein referred to as Alma) in the District Court. Timken sought a declaration that certain transfer cases manufactured by it did not come within the terms of the non-exclusive license Alma had granted. It also sought a declaration that the Ruggles-Smith patent 2.173.044 was invalid in view of the prior art which existed at the time of the application for the patent. The learned District Judge made detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law and, in a thoroughly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Alma Motor Co. v. Timken-Detroit Axle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Massachusetts Hair & Felt Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Automatic Paper Machinery Co. v. Marcalus Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Joe Bailey Emerson v. Labor Investment Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Cold Metal Products Co. v. Crucible Steel Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
- Garland v. Remington Arms Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- National Cash Register Co. v. Realty & Industrial Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.