Legal Opinion

United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. Kamborian

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 16, 1948No. 4344PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

This is the second appeal by the defendant in an infringement suit brought by a patent owner, Kamborian and his licensee. The subject-matter of the patents is a machine for performing the lasting operation on shoes, which is the process of stretching the leather or cloth of the upper over the insole and then connecting the edge of the upper to the insole. The description of the machine and the claims of the inventor are fully set forth in our opinion upon the first appeal reported, 1 Cir., 160 F.2d 461. They need not be repeated ‘here. The inventor had won in the first…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Eames v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. KamborianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
  4. White v. E. L. Bruce Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  5. Kamborian v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marvin Glass & Associates v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
  2. International Shoe Machine Corp. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API