Legal Opinion

Galion Metallic Vault Co. v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 30, 1948No. 9497PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

There are two patents involved in this matter. The first is for a compartment or space in an automobile truck between the chassis and the body platform for holding a spare tire or tires. The second is for a support to which the tire is anchored in a horizontal position in that comprtment and by which it can be swung down to a vertical position along the side of the truck. The court below found both patents invalid for lack of invention. There was also a finding of misuse of the patents.

The lack of invention as to the compartment is predicated principally upon the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Leitch Manufacturing Co. v. Barber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Park-In Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
  3. Waldes Kohinoor, Inc. v. Industrial Retaining Ring Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1961
  4. Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Selas Corp. of America v. Purolator Products, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API