Legal Opinion
Pillis v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 1, 1976No. 9608PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERN, Associate Judge:
Petitioner, licensed to operate a taxi within the District of Columbia, challenges an order entered by the Hackers’ License Appeal Board (Board) suspending for three months his license. After review of the record and consideration of petitioner’s numerous contentions, we are satisfied that there is substantial evidence in the record to sustain the Board’s findings and its conclusions of law are not erroneous. Accordingly, the suspension order must be affirmed.
There was testimony that petitioner was operating his taxicab on the night of March 5, 1975, and parked in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re GrobanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Proctor v. Hackers' BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Miller v. District of Columbia Commission on Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- In Re D. C. Human Relations Commission v. National Geographic SocietyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
3Cited by10 opinions
- German v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Jones v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Babazadeh v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Carpenter v. District of Columbia Traffic Adjudication Appeal BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Hedgman v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.