Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. District of Columbia Traffic Adjudication Appeal Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1987No. 86-511PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

Petitioner’s driver’s license was suspended for one year because his motor vehicle was operated while uninsured. We reject petitioner’s contentions that he was denied a fair hearing and that the decision was not supported by substantial evidence. However, since the District of Columbia Traffic Adjudication Appeal Board (“the Board”) imposed a suspension in excess of that permitted by the applicable regulations, we remand for imposition of a lawful period of suspension.

I

It is undisputed that petitioner’s vehicle was not insured for approximately a six-month period in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Quick v. Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Pillis v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Ahmed v. District of Columbia Hackers License Appeal BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Jones v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gilles v. TouchstoneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
  2. Tapscott v. Dairyland InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
  3. Carpenter v. DC TRAFFIC ADJUD. APP. BD.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Gilles v. WareDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Gilles v. WareDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API