Carpenter v. District of Columbia Traffic Adjudication Appeal Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Petitioner’s driver’s license was suspended for one year because his motor vehicle was operated while uninsured. We reject petitioner’s contentions that he was denied a fair hearing and that the decision was not supported by substantial evidence. However, since the District of Columbia Traffic Adjudication Appeal Board (“the Board”) imposed a suspension in excess of that permitted by the applicable regulations, we remand for imposition of a lawful period of suspension.
I
It is undisputed that petitioner’s vehicle was not insured for approximately a six-month period in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Quick v. Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Pillis v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Ahmed v. District of Columbia Hackers License Appeal BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Jones v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gilles v. TouchstoneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- Tapscott v. Dairyland InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- Carpenter v. DC TRAFFIC ADJUD. APP. BD.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Gilles v. WareDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gilles v. WareDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992