Babazadeh v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the District of Columbia Hackers’ License Appeal Board (the Board) suspending his hacker’s license for a period of 30 days. Petitioner claims that the suspension proceeding violated his procedural rights provided by the District of Columbia Administrative Procedure Act (DCAPA), D.C.Code 1973, § 1-1501 et seq. Petitioner also argues that the Board failed to follow its own rule of procedure which mandates special procedures for pro se litigants. 34 DCRR 5.4 Special Edition. 1 We agree with both claims and vacate the suspension order. 2
The incident leading…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Proctor v. Hackers' BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Pillis v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses' Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Berkley v. D.C. Transit, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- McLean v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ridge v. Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Selk v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.