City of Birmingham v. Brock
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff was convicted in the Recorder's Court of the City of Birmingham and sentenced to hard labor, as authorized by the statute. Title 62, § 654, Code 1940. In execution of the hard labor sentence he was required to work on a private road of the city leading to its industrial water plant. This work was of a corporate character and this Court is now committed to the proposition that the municipality is liable to the convict for wrongful or negligent conduct of its agent in the performance of such character of work. That question has been here sharply debated and may…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Bessemer v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Hillman v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- City of Tuscaloosa v. FittsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- City of Anniston v. HillmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Water Works Board of City of Birmingham v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- City of Montgomery v. QuinnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- McSheridan v. City of TalladegaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- City of Birmingham v. LakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Gainer v. School Board of Jefferson County, Ala.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1955