Legal Opinion

Water Works Board of City of Birmingham v. Stephens

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 24, 1955No. 6 Div. 800PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a proceeding begun by a petition to the Board of Adjustment of the City of Birmingham in respect to its zoning ordinance: the petitioner being the Water \J/jorks Board of the City of Birmingham. v^qs agreed that petitioner is a “public sef/yjcp ¡corporation and a municipal utility as; cqrjtpjjfplated .by the General City Code of Birmingham,” and therefore an agency of the city. Jackson v. Hubbard, 256 Ala. 114, 53 So.2d 723. We presume, therefore, that it was set up under authority of section 394, Title 37, Code of 1940, and that the city has conveyed to it the water system which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nelson v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Sunny Slope Water Co. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Taber v. City of Benton HarborMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Jefferson County v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ball v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. City of Pittsburgh v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 321 v. Water Works BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  4. Brownfield v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. Richardson v. MorrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API