Legal Opinion

Hillman v. City of Anniston

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 6, 1926No. 7 Div. 616PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The case is here upon the ruling sustaining plea No. 3 as against apt grounds of demurrer. The complaint and plea No. 3 appear in the report of the case. The one legal question presented on this appeal is: Is a municipal corporation liable under the homicide act for the death of a city convict by wrongful act of the officer or agent guarding and superintending the work of the prisoner in the repair and maintenance of the streets of the c-ity?

As regards the public making use of the streets of a city, it has been the long-declared law of this state that in the maintenance of public streets and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. CarleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. City of Bessemer v. WhaleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Smoot v. Mayor of WetumpkaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  4. Dargan v. Mayor of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  5. City of Bessemer v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State Docks Commission v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. City of Birmingham v. WestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Turk v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Williams v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. City of Anniston v. HillmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API