Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. Lake

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 8, 1942No. 6 Div. 21PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The City of Birmingham, for the primary purpose of furnishing cheap water for industrial uses in the Birmingham District, installed an Industrial Waterworks System, at a cost of some $4,500,000, and now sells some 20,000,000 gallons per day to such industries, and 5,000,000 gallons per day to Birmingham Waterworks Company, a public service corporation, to be processed, and used for domestic purposes.

To provide a water supply, the city impounded the waters of Blackburn Fork of Black Warrior River, a non-navigable stream, creating Blackburn Lake some seven miles in length and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Hood v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. City of Birmingham v. BrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Jones v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1904

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Herston v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Trailway Oil Company v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. City of Decatur v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Water Works Board of City of Birmingham v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. In re Opinion of The JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API