Legal Opinion

Christie v. Christie

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1929No. Docket No. 6716PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCAS, J., pro tem.

Appeal is taken from an order vacating a final decree of divorce. By an interlocutory judgment of divorce made March 5, 1926, and entered March 8, 1926, it was adjudged that plaintiff was entitled to a divorce from the defaulting defendant. The judgment did not include or refer to the court’s order, also made on March 5th, awarding plaintiff certain household goods and the custody of the minor child of the parties and providing for the support of plaintiff and said child and the payment of attorney’s fees. Thereafter, on March 9, 1926, and without notice, plaintiff caused…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Claudius v. MelvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Kowalsky v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. McConville v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Decoe v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Lámar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Kohlstedt v. HauseurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Kohlstedt v. HauseurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API