Kohlstedt v. Hauseur
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
24 Cal.App.2d 60 (1937)
CLARA KOHLSTEDT, Appellant,
v.
FREDERICK J. HAUSEUR et al., Defendants; BEN GOLD, Respondent.
Civ. No. 11588.
California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division Two.
December 14, 1937.
Frederick G. Stoehr for Appellant.
Robert F. Shippee and Don L. Gilman for Respondent.
Crail, P. J.
After devoting a week to the trial of the case, the trial court on October 24, 1934, signed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The first conclusion of law was that the plaintiff was entitled to judgment against defendant Hauseur, and the second, "That plaintiff is not entitled to…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Kaufman v. ShainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Robson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.