Legal Opinion
Decoe v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 1921No. Civ. No. 2342PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an appeal from an order setting aside and vacating a judgment entered upon the pleadings in this action and requiring the plaintiff, Addie DeCoe, “to render an accounting of the partnership affairs, or the business interests of said plaintiff and defendant in the growing of rice during the year 1919, with said Edward T. Johnson, deceased. ’ ’
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff, Addie DeCoe, who was a married woman and the wife of the plaintiff, C. A. DeCoe, was the owner in her separate right and as her separate property of an undivided one-half interest of a certain tract of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Killian v. EbbinghausSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- In re LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Warner v. F. Thomas Parisian Dyeing & Cleaning WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Toy v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estate of AbdallahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Winget v. WoodsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Young v. BriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Christie v. ChristieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929