Legal Opinion

LaRosa v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1981No. Civ. 51523PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CALDECOTT, P. J.

The question presented by this petition for writ of mandate or prohibition is whether defendants, who are in the business of selling various kinds of used machinery, are strictly liable for a defect of undetermined origin in a machine which defendants sold but which they neither inspected, repaired nor modified.

Petitioner Rock LaRosa, plaintiff in the underlying action for damages for personal injury (claimant) was injured when a punch press, owned by his employer, malfunctioned. The employer had purchased the punch press, used, from real party in interest Joe Ciar &…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Becker v. IRM Corp.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Saldana v. Globe-Weis Systems Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Gonzalez v. Rutherford Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  5. Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API